Quantum Time Reversal Is Normal at Neuronal Level

1. For a long time, I have been looking for an explanation of some "future viewings" I have had in the past.

2. The best explanation I can find after a 30 year search is the quantum brain hypothesis. See, http://watarts.uwaterloo.ca/~sreinis/quantum.html for a partial answer although the authors in this article think "time reversal" is just too weird, it cannot be denied at the neuronal level.

3. here's an anecdotal piece:


[2] by DeadFred
on Sat, 06/25/2011 - 00:48
#1400617
www.zero hedge.com

There's a pretty far out factor to consider relating to speed. When I used to work in neuro-science research I came across a very hard-to-comprehend but highly reproducible phenomenon, time is fuzzy at the nano-second level these algos are working at. Imagine a test subject with probes measuring the firing of some individual neurons. Show the subjects one of three types of photos and measure the neurons firing in response to the photos. The first type of photo is pleasant (fuzzy kitten, rainbow or such). The second type is startling (snake or tarantula for example) the third type is arousing (girl in bikini or the like). Different neurons respond to the different types of photos. The really bizarre thing is that the correct neurons will start to fire BEFORE the photo is shown, even when neither the subject and researcher know what type of photo will be shown. This effect is at the nano-second level, it's real, it incomprehesible, and it's so common I've seen it occur in several neural training research presentations where no one even bothers to comment on it. The best explanation I've heard suggests that time behaves similar to a quantum wave so there is a fuzziness that allows leakage of the future into the past. If you want to boggle your mind let Mr. Google lead you
down this rabbit hole."

3. My technical argument pro-time-reversal has to do with an improvement of a calculation made by Eugene Wigner, who applied the Shrodinger equation to a two state world populated by "nutrient" and "beings". Of course this is very crude, and he managed to show that the survival of beings for most scenarios were improbable to the extreme. He also mentioned that what was lacking in quantum calculations was taking account of "consciousness" since the quantum event obviously affected consciousness, could consciousness affect the event? Anyway, he had no way but to indicate that no complete answer was available unless or until quantum theory could include consciousness.

4. What makes sense to me now is that the neuronal-brain-body complex is a quantum calculator. I prefer to call it a calculator rather than computer because the quantum phenomena is really not at all in any mystical software or esoteric learning, but just simply the result of well reproducible processes. The entanglement of the self-replicator's on-board quantum processes allows for time reversal and thus, greatly increases the chance of its successful replication. Put another way which is the isomorphism of the previous statement, the future leaks to the present.